Substrat

Cum vedem lucrurile ? "Asa cum sunt", spune masina. Dar lucrurile nu "sunt asa", si ne e frica sa le vedem asa cum stim ca sunt. Asta inseamna "trauma civilizarii".
"Civilizatia" e doar exteriorul. Nu e realitatea. "Vise, utopii, trezeste-te la realitate". Realitatea nu e vopseaua asta. Sa spui asa ceva - la fel de bine un om tocmai scapat dintr-o temnita, iese, se uita, spune "asta nu se poate", "trebuie sa revin la realitate" si intra la loc. Noi cream realitatea. Ne e insa frica s-o vedem asa cum vrem, am fost educati sa ne fie frica.
Substratul ramane insa. Descrierea "realitatii" - nu are prea mult efect, pentru ca in subconstient stim - ca lucrurile nu sunt asa cum le vedem in jur. Cu toata masina din jur, subconstientul e tribal. "Noi" exista acolo, a existat dintotdeauna. Nu se mai manifesta insa in "realitate", a fost negat.
Sus, in "constient" a ramas doar cinismul "asa sunt lucrurile". Desi stim ca nu sunt asa.

Cum ni-i imaginam pe extraterestrii care sa zicem ca ne viziteaza ? Ca pe niste "ei", care nu au alta treaba, si mai trec pe aici. "Ei" - fiecare din ei, un membru al "lor". Nu un servitor, un mercenar, un "angajat", etc. Subconstientul nu-i vede ca fiind separati. La fel - se intampla si cand unii oameni vorbesc despre "natiuni". Care nu exista de fapt. E o viziune "copilareasca" - dar e viziunea reala, asa cum stim ca sunt lucrurile. Poate fi ceva format prin evolutie - subconstientul se asteapta sa fie parte dintr-un trib/natiune, acceptat neconditionat, apoi - constientul se poate ocupa de - ce are el chef.
Constientul acum insa spune "vise" sau "trezeste-te la realitate". Nici nu mai stie pe ce lume e. Oamenii au fost separati de ei insisi. Subconstientul e cenzurat.
Nu e vorba de o "fuga de realitate". Realitatea e intr-adevar cea care se vede. Dar a spune "asta e, asa sunt lucrurile prin natura lor" - e rezultatul modificarii.

http://www.primitivism.com/machine-heads.htm
"In childhood, a modern person travels an enormous distance between stone-age primitive creature and responsible contemporary citizen. When confronted with the awesome power of civilization whose first representatives are parents, teachers, priests (and, later on, police officers, legislators and bosses) the child faces, psychologically, the same situation as its tribal ancestors, namely, conform to the dictates of civilization or die. The helplessness of childhood makes the threat of bodily harm or loss of love, which is used by the parents and others to enforce civilized morality and civilized education, a traumatic experience. The developing little person becomes afraid to express its own tribal nature. There is much fear that lies at the bottom of becoming a civilized adult.

When the child becomes aware of ideas and impulses that oppose the dictates of civilization, s/he experiences anxiety, which is the signal for danger. It is not the insights and urges themselves that the child fears, but rather the reaction to them on the part of those in charge. Since the child cannot escape from those who control its life, s/he runs away from dangerous thoughts and feelings. In other words, the child institutes repression of its primitive self. Tribal ideas are now isolated, cut off from awareness, and unable to properly influence the future course of events.
The trauma or inescapable terror of civilization is responsible for the derangement of reason. That inner dialogue in the human mind that is the hallmark of self-consciousness has ceased, because the depth-dimension of reflective thought, which is the primitive mind, has been silenced. Modern people no longer hear their own primal voice, and without interaction between new ideas and old ideas, the demands of the individual and the demands of the tribe (and species), there is no deep thinking. On the contrary, when reason is cut off at the roots, it becomes shallow, unable to determine what is of true value in life.

The passage of tribal ideas from the oldest and deepest layer of the mind into individual consciousness is part of the natural, normal functioning of the human mind. Deep thinking is not the result of education; it is innate, our birthright as Homo sapiens. "